"PUBLIC OFFICIALS BEHAVING BADLY"
What BEGAN with an INTENTIONAL, OVERT LIE, DECEPTION
& the AUTHORING of an OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT by
that he KNEW contained FALSE & FABRICATED INFORMATION,
Waconia based law firm MELCHERT, HUBERT & SJODIN, as well as
OFFICE OF LAWYERS PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY,
MANIPULATION of the CRIMINAL JUSTICE
SYSTEM to ESCAPE PROSECUTION,
MINNESOTA ATTORNEY GENERAL KEITH ELLISON,
COMMISSIONER of the MINNESOTA SUPREME
COURT TIMOTHY J. DROSKE,
an 'appointee' of the
WALZ ADMINISTRATION
as well as
MINNESOTA GOVERNOR
and current
VICE PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE TIM WALZ !!
The PUBLICLY RELEASING Of Some Of My Personal Letters Sent To MINNESOTA GOVERNOR WALZ
(Which He IGNORED) Alerting Him, And Others; Of The MISCONDUCT, CORRUPTION and 'COVER-UP'
Involving PUBLIC OFFICIALS In The CITY OF HAMBURG And In CARVER COUNTY, Has Now Begun.
In All Of The 'GLITZ & GLAMOUR' Of KAMALA HARRIS Becoming The Democratic Nominee In The
Upcoming Presidential Election, She Apparently FAILED TO ADEQUATELY 'VET', If At All;
The 'Pick' For Her VICE PRESIDENTIAL 'RUNNING MATE' !! A Simple 'INTERNET SEARCH'
Of ANY Of MY WEBSITES Would Have REVEALED That MINNESOTA GOVERNOR
TIM WALZ Has Some 'Skeletons In His Closet'.
PLEASE CHECK BACK FREQUENTLY As MORE Letters & Documents Are Being PUBLICLY RELEASED On My Website.
MINNESOTA GOVERNOR TIM WALZ Is CLEARLY IMPLICATED
In What Was Taking Place as
EVIDENCED By The LETTERS CONTAINED HEREIN !!
ADDITIONAL LETTERS And DOCUMENTS INTRODUCED, PROVE BEYOND
A REASONABLE DOUBT; That MINNESOTA GOVERNOR TIM WALZ Was ALSO
INVOLVED And KNEW EXACTLY WHAT WAS TAKING PLACE With The
PUBLIC OFFICIALS In The CITY OF HAMBURG, The
And The Subsequent 'COVER-UP' !!
This Lady Really KNEW What She Was Saying:
"THE 'COVER UP', MORE THAN THE INITIAL WRONGDOING;
IS WHAT IS MOST LIKELY TO BRING YOU DOWN."
MADELYN ALBRIGHT, (Former) UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF STATE
PLEASE CHECK BACK FREQUENTLY As MORE ANSWERS,
EXAMPLES And INFORMATION Are Added To This Webpage !!
Please Check Back Frequently As The 'Pieces' Of
"THE CITY OF HAMBURG"
'Jigsaw Puzzle' That I've 'Dug Up', All Begin To 'Fit Together' !!
VIOLATION EXAMPLE
MINNESOTA STATUTE 609.43
'DOUBLE STANDARD'
When HAMBURG MAYOR CHRIS LUND'S SON COMMITTED VANDALISM AGAINST THE CITY
It Was 'COVERED' UP'; NO LEGAL ACTION TAKEN And MAYOR LUND'S SON NEVER
SAW THE INSIDE OF A COURTROOM !!
BUT, When The CHILD OF A CITY RESIDENT
COMMITTED VANDALISM AGAINST THE CITY,HAMBURG MAYOR CHRIS LUND
PUBLICLY BOASTS
That Residents Child Was REFERRED To The CARVER COUNTY ATTORNEY'S
OFFICE FOR PROSECUTION !!
Hamburg Residents Should Be OUTRAGED !!
VIOLATION EXAMPLE
MINNESOTA STATUTE 609.43
How Can
ANYONE
'Transact
Business' With The
City On A
Weekday
When The
CITY OFFICE
IS CLOSED
ALL DAY ??
EXAMPLE:
Upon completion Grinder Station Recostruction on Jacob Street, the City spent Taxpayer Dollars to plant new grass. The PROBLEM is, however; that NEW GRASS NEEDS WATER !!
(Ask ANY 'First Grader' !!)
Because THE CITY DIDN'T WATER THE NEW GRASS, it has DIED and will HAVE TO BE REPLANTED AGAIN !!How many TAXPAYER DOLLARS have ALREADY BEEN
WASTED (and WILL BE WASTED AGAIN when
the grass is REPLANTED) because of
the CITY'S NEGLIGENCE ??
Photo Taken On 09-18-24 @ 10:55 PM
HOW INCONSIDERATE IS THIS:
Instead of Further ‘BERATING’ & EMBARRASSING City
Residents By Making It ‘PUBLICLY KNOWN’ That Their
City Utility Bill Is Overdue, Wouldn’t It Be MORE
APPROPRIATE, MAKE MORE SENSE, Be
MORE BUSINESSLIKE & MORE
PROFESSIONAL To Make
Such A Notification,
Via A FIRST CLASS LETTER Sent To The
City Resident In A SEALED ENVELOPE ??
EXAMPLE:
On Friday, September 27, 2024; Governor Walz Directed That
All United States & Minnesota flags be flown at half-staff from Sunrise until Sunset on Sunday, September 29; 2024
to honor Firefighters who have been killed or
injured in the Line of Duty.
EXAMPLE:
Photo Taken On 09-29-24 @ 12:55 PM
Photo Taken On 09-23-24 @ 12:42 PM
| ||||||
November 5, 2014
Mr. Chris Lund, Councilmember
Personnel Committee Member
City of Hamburg
181 Broadway Avenue
Hamburg, Minnesota 55339
Dear Councilmember Lund:
Pursuant to our telephone conversation last week, I bring the following topics involving Hamburg City Clerk/Treasurer Jeremy Gruenhagen to the attention of the
Personnel Committee for their consideration and recommendation(s) to be forwarded to the full Hamburg City Council. I have talked with Councilmember Trebesch
about the matters outlined below. Steve suggested that after you and he, as members of the Personnel Committee, have read over everything, that the two of you
meet with the Hamburg City Attorney to discuss what the city’s options are. I believe that to be an excellent suggestion !!
However, to avoid ANY question of violating the state’s ‘Open Meeting’ law, I PURPOSELY have NOT provided Councilmember Trebesch with a copy of this
letter or any of the enclosed documents; you’ll have to ‘share’.
I
MISREPRESENTATION
An assertion or manifestation by words or conduct that is not in accord with the facts.
After my sending two, separate letters to Robb’s Electric and after not receiving any response to those two letters or to two separate telephone calls placed to
Robb’s Electric, I have been wholly UNABLE TO VERIFY the existence ANY of the negative comments being said or any negative information, allegedly
stated against me, by any employee of Robb’s Electric, to him, as stated by Mr. Gruenhagen to, and before, the entire Hamburg City Council at the
City Council Meeting on September 9th.
When Mr. Gruenhagen was describing, before the entire Hamburg City Council, the details of the alleged ’complaint’ he received against me by an employee of
Robb’s Electric, I noticed very distinct changes in his normal vocalization, tone of his voice and ’body language’; not consistent with Mr. Gruenhagen’s usual
mannerisms and demeanor that I have continually observed for the past several years.
I immediately suspected that the details of the ‘complaint’ against me Mr. Gruenhagen stated that he allegedly received were most probably, in fact, at best exaggerated (if any complaint was actually received at all), or, at worst, fabricated by Mr. Gruenhagen.
I truly, and simply, don’t believe that any such complaint against me was ever initiated by Robb’s Electric. The facts simply don’t support Mr. Gruenhagen’s allegation.
Were these alleged ‘complaints’ against me (if there were any, in fact), ‘solicited’ by Mr. Gruenhagen? Probably. Or, were the ‘fabricated’ by Mr. Gruenhagen. Quite possibly.
In the approximate twenty months that I have been a member of the Hamburg City Council, I have ALWAYS, unequivocally ’supported’ Mr. Gruenhagen. More than
once he has told me, in the past, that I turned out to be his ‘strongest ally’. On several occasions, Mr. Gruenhagen told me, directly, that “If it weren’t for you and
Steve (Trebesch), I wouldn’t ‘be here.’”.
I fully trusted and respected Mr. Gruenhagen since the day I was elected to the Hamburg City Council (and before) and believed him to be my good friend.
Now, however, after what I’ve personally experienced because of him and what he’s done against me, how can I ever again trust him again after what I’ve just
witnessed and the personal embarrassment, humiliation and degradation that I’ve been forced to endure; by someone who I believed to be sincere and was
my good friend ?
II
INSUBORDINATION
Insubordination is a defiance of authority directed toward a higher level manager or boss.
When asked to identify the vendor who allegedly made the complaint to him, Mr. Gruenhagen reluctantly stated that the vendor was Robb’s Electric. When
I asked for the name of the specific individual who made the alleged complaint to him, Mr. Gruenhagen avoided providing the requested information.
The ‘accused’ has the ‘right’ to know his accuser. If, in fact, one even exists.
A single refusal, by Mr. Gruenhagen, to provide the requested information to an elected City Council member is grounds for disciplinary action. Yet, Mr. Gruenhagen
compounded his improper conduct by refusing to provide the requested information to me a second, and a third, time, is unconscionable.
I sent Mr. Gruenhagen three e-mails formally asking him to identify the person from Robb’s Electric who made the alleged complaint. These written requests were sent on September 10, 2014, September 11, 2014 and September 13, 2014.
When requested and as a city employee, Mr. Gruenhagen is obligated to provide information to any member of the Hamburg City Council. Yet, he has NEVER
provided the name of the person(s) representing Robb’s Electric that he (allegedly) has spoken with.
III
INAPPROPRIATE INVOLVEMENT
I can ‘speak for myself’; and choose to do so.
On Saturday, September 13, 2014, I met with Mayor Malz, at his home, to discuss what had taken place at the September 9th Hamburg City Council meeting. I expressed my dismay at the manner in which Mr. Gruenhagen, without my knowledge or authorization, (apparently) freely and openly discussed my involvement and interaction with someone representing Robb’s Electric and opted to ’speak on my behalf’.
Mayor Malz agreed with me that Mr. Gruenhagen’s talking with anyone from Robb’s Electric about my demeanor with employees of their company, instead of talking directly with me, was improper. I suggested to Mayor Malz that Mr. Gruenhagen “…..wouldn’t do it to you”; to which the Mayor replied words to the effect, “I can speak for myself.”
So can I.
Mr. Gruenhagen’s entire, unsolicited conduct in this matter, on my behalf and without my authorization, coupled with his steadfast refusal to provide the
information requested by me, an elected official of the City of Hamburg, is unacceptable.
IV
INAPPROPRIATE CONDUCT
There is no place for rudeness and abusive language in the workplace. Blatant rudeness and the use of foul language is usually considered gross misconduct, especially if it is regularly demonstrated on the job.
On numerous occasions and since approximately September 2013, I personally have observed Mr. Gruenhagen in highly agitated states while on duty at the Hamburg City Office. During his vociferous tirades and uncontrolled outbursts, Mr. Gruenhagen has stated how much he dislikes his job, how he can’t (paraphrasing) ’get my work done’, how much he is (paraphrasing) ’bothered’ by ‘everyone coming into my office’ preventing him from doing his work, how he just wants a job where (paraphrasing) “I can sit in my own little cubicle and do my work without being bothered.’
Eventually, because of the quantity and severity of his tirades and outbursts and his claiming, numerous times, (paraphrasing) “...this job is affecting my family” , I offered a possible, positive alternative by stating (words to the effect) “….If this job is affecting you and your family so badly, perhaps it would be better for you and your family for you to seek an alternate, more suitable source of employment.”
Additionally, Mr. Gruenhagen has threatened to “...quit my job” numerous times because it (apparently) is too overwhelming for him at times. In fact, he had an unsigned Letter of Resignation that he had written sitting in plain view, on his desk, that was observed by another City Council member and possibly other city employees.
While I used to frequently visit City Hall two or three times a week, I have intentionally avoided stopping in at City Hall since approximately June of this year because of what I consider Mr. Gruenhagen’s unacceptable behavior and all of the ‘negativity’ within the confines of City Hall.
V
PROFANITY
Profanity is language or behavior that is considered to be vulgar, rude or offensive. The use of profanity in everyday life, such as in the workplace, can be deemed appalling or even disrespectful to those around us.
Because of the open use of profanity that I had basically continuously observed previously, I sent an e-mail message, on April 14, 2013, to Mr. Gruenhagen that, among other things, requested that all city officials ‘be more cognizant’ of their inappropriate use of profanity while representing the City of Hamburg.
During his tirades and uncontrolled outbursts, Mr. Gruenhagen has frequently been heard to freely use profanity (such as slang for fecal material and using the Lord’s name in vain)
when other employees and/or City Council members are present.
Particularly troubling to me is the frequent use of the “F-Bomb’ profanity in the presence of our newly hired female Deputy City Clerk. When I met with Mayor Malz on September 13th, I also discussed the issue of profanity in the presence of the city’s newly hired Deputy City Clerk.
Deputy Malz agreed that such language is not acceptable and that he would talk with the Deputy City Clerk. A week or two ago I asked the Deputy City Clerk if, in fact, the Mayor had spoken to her about the overall ‘working environment’ at City Hall.
She stated that he had not.
And when I brought a vendor to the City Hall with the intention of introducing him to the Hamburg’s City Clerk/Treasurer, when we walked into the building, the first thing
we heard was Mr. Gruenhagen screaming “THEY CAN TAKE THIS JOB AND SHOVE IT” to whoever he was talking to on the (city’s) telephone.
The embarrassment I experienced is indescribable; I apologized to the vendor by saying (words to the effect), “Jeremy must be having another ‘bad day’” and we immediately left the building.
VI
ATTENEDANCE
I have witnessed that Mr. Gruenhagen is absent from his job more than what I consider to be normal or acceptable. While it is true that the City Council approves vacation days for him to take off, there have been numerous circumstances wherein he’s not at work because of illness or other reason. I believe the City Council members, all of us, are obligated to know whenever our City Clerk Treasurer isn’t able to work as scheduled.
While I certainly am acceptable to having to take a ’pre-approved’ day off ‘here and there’ for personal/medical reasons, it appears to me and as far as I know, there is no ‘recording’ or ‘accounting’ of him not working on scheduled work days.
Approximately one year ago, Councilmember Trebesch suggested a time clock be installed for ALL employees so the city could ‘keep track’ of their ‘hours worked’. At that time, I didn’t think it was necessary.
I’ve completely reversed my thinking about that topic; I totally support the installation of a time clock.
Also, I don’t believe it’s unreasonable, and I believe it is appropriate, for the city to require Mr. Gruenhagen to provide a full accounting of his hours/days off not previously approved during 2014.
When I discussed this topic with Mayor Malz on September 13th, he told me, directly, that he had previously asked Mr. Gruenhagen to provide an ’accounting’ of days that he had not worked that had not been previously approved.
Mayor Malz told me, again, directly; that Mr. Gruenhagen stated that he ’didn’t have to’ provide that information to the city !!
Mayor Malz further went on to state that he then contacted the Hamburg City Attorney as asked if Mr. Gruenhagen was required to ‘account for’ the days that he had taken off without prior approval.
Mayor Malz told me, again directly, that the City Attorney stated that Mr. Gruenhagen, in fact, as an employee of the City of Hamburg, IS REQUIRED to provide the requested information.
VII
NEGLECT OF DUTY
How many times at City Council meetings, has a certain topic or subject been brought up that was previously discussed and authorized to be purchased, completed, etc., by the City Council?
Sometime, at a later date when a City Councilmember would inquire as to the ’status’ of one of those topics or projects, how often have we, as a City Council, been told that nothing had been done and given the excuse, “That must have fallen through the cracks” or “That must have slipped through the cracks.”
Since Mr. Gruenhagen ‘assumed command and control’ of the rebuilding of the Jacob Street Grinder Station, NOTHING FURTHER to complete the project, has taken place !! When he declared that he was ’in charge’ at the September 9th City Council meeting, the Jacob Street Grinder Station needed a weatherproof, generator connection installed, it needed an LED ’area light’ installed, and it needed a weatherproof 110 volt convenience installed.
Now, two months later and under Mr. Gruenhagen’s assumed direction and control, NONE of those three items have been accomplished or completed !!
Additionally, in a September 8th e-mail to Mr. Gruenhagen, I stated “Also, I strongly urge that when this all finally does happen, that you ensure that Robb’s Electric physically connects the generator to the lift station and that everything be run ‘under load’ for a period of time to ensure everything is working properly.”
As of about two weeks ago when I inquired, I was told that this hadn’t been done; I seriously doubt if its EVER been done.
Also, at the September 9th City Council meeting, Mayor Malz expressed concern about the order in which Floyd Security notifies city personnel in the event of a ‘problem’ at the Water Treatment Plant or Park Avenue Lift Station.
On September 15th, after conferring with Floyd Security, I submitted, to Mr. Gruenhagen, via e-mail, directed to Mayor Malz and the other City Council members, a suggested, updated notification sequence to be used by Floyd for alarms at the city’s two locations monitored by their alarm company.
In checking with both Floyd Security and another City Council member, I was advised that NEITHER of them had received the information I sent to Mr. Gruenhagen.
Mr. Gruenhagen has CONTINUALLY been reminded, by me, that the exterior ‘area light’ on the north side of the Fire Station burns twenty-four hours a day even though it contains a photo-electric cell designed to turn it off during daylight. Mr. Gruenhagen has stated repeatedly that he would contact the electrical contractor that installed the LED lights on the entire building, Robb’s Electric, and get the light replaced or repaired.
Yet, as recently as this week, it continues to be illuminated around the clock.
These are just a few instances of ‘needed things not getting done’. Ironically, when I met with Mayor Malz on September 13, he, too, believes that Mr. Gruenhagen doesn’t always ’follow through’ with his responsibilities by saying to me, directly; “He doesn’t always get everything done.”
VIII
EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT
Employee misconduct, because it subjects an employee to disciplinary action up to, and including, termination of employment, MUST be taken seriously.
I believe that a ‘case can be made’ for Employee Misconduct based on the content of this document and the several pages of supporting documents accompanying this letter.
Should the city’s only female employee choose to terminate her city employment because of the unacceptable working conditions to which she has been subjected for the past six or seven months, she is certain to be victorious should she decide to initiate civil litigation against the city.
Think about it: If I’m sworn to ‘tell the truth’ about what I’ve observed, in a court of law, there is no way that I can ‘forget’ or minimize, what I’ve seen and heard as a City Council member.
If any other City Council member(s) or other city employees or representatives are dragged into court and are also sworn to ‘tell the truth’, that’s what they have to do. Period !!
Because of what’s taken place in the past, partially documented in this letter and on the attached supporting documents, the City of Hamburg now faces a potentially perilous, litigious situation.
“The city knew, or should have known ………….”
Our city, like may other similar cities of our size, have a limited number of full time and part time employees. Like Hamburg, similar cities rely on an equivalent to our City Clerk/Treasurer to ensure that the day to day needs of the city, and its citizens, are continually met.
It is impossible to delineate each and every duty of any of the three of our city employees. Our employees have to be ‘flexible’ enough to adapt to the ever-changing needs of our city and its residents. In my opinion, a City Clerk/Treasurer, or similar position, REQUIRES that that person be able to ‘maintain their cool’ when stressful situations arise; not rush into a raging tirade.
Granted; this past year has been an extremely unusual year for the City of Hamburg. The only way that we can be effective to our citizens is by ‘working together’; not by trying to demonstrate who has the most power or the most influence. I believe the rest of the City Council would agree with my philosophy: Forget about “….. Who gets the credit; just ‘get the job done’”.
It would appear that Mr. Gruenhagen has ‘lost sight’ of the fact that he is an employee of the City of Hamburg and his ‘bosses’ of the city are the elected City Council members; collectively AND individually. In the most simplistic terms, we give him direction and authority; he doesn’t assume direction or authority arbitrarily, by himself.
The ‘tail doesn’t wag the dog’.
The City Council MUST UNITE to swiftly, and steadfastly, rectify the circumstances and causes, past and future, that currently exist within the walls of City Hall and subject city employees to a less than an ideal working environment.
Probably more than any other City Council member and because of my ‘retirement status’, I have had more interaction with Mr. Gruenhagen than has any other City Council member. I respected his position (and still do) and sincerely believed that he respected my newly elected position when I took office in January 2013.
For the next eighteen months, I would go to City Hall several times a week, if only briefly, and talk with Mr. Gruenhagen about various items of ’city business’ of mutual interest to both of us.
Early on, I made it very clear to Mr. Gruenhagen that anything that might involve me and the city that I believed he should be made aware of, that I would inform him of so he would not be ‘surprised’ if he heard about me ‘being involved’ in something/anything city related. Mr. Gruenhagen stated that he appreciated the fact that I would ‘keep him informed’.
I can’t count the number of times since taking office that Mr. Gruenhagen and I discussed the various e-mails that I would send to him in an effort to ‘keep him informed’. I was ‘sensitive’ to not ‘overloading’ him with information and inquired numerous times if I was sending him ‘too much’ information in the form of e-mails generated.
Each time I inquired, Mr. Gruenhagen assured me that he’d much rather have ‘too much information’ than ‘too little information’; he could always ‘sort out and discard’ what wasn’t relevant; and he could make the decision of what he wanted to retain. That seemed logical to me.
The enclosed e-mail messages exchanged between the two of us demonstrates, without a doubt, that I strived to keep Mr. Gruenhagen informed of my every ‘involvement’ in ‘city business’. It is quite evident, by reviewing the enclosed supporting documents, that I ALWAYS sought Mr. Gruenhagen’s input.
It is also worth noting and to the best of my knowledge, I NEVER authorized the expenditure of any funds for any city ‘project’ in which I was involved; I NEVER ordered anything for any city ‘project’ in which I was involved without first gaining ‘permission’ from Mr. Gruenhagen.
As evidenced by the enclosed supporting documents, I ALWAYS left those decisions up to Mr. Gruenhagen. I was very ‘comfortable’ with that and believed then, and believe now, that was/is how it should be.
Yet, when I met with Mayor Malz on Saturday, September 13th, he stated that Mr. Gruenhagen ’complained’ about all of the massive amounts of e-mails that I was ’flooding’ Mr. Gruenhagen with. What?
I explained to Mayor Malz what the ‘agreement’ Mr. Gruenhagen and I had reached regarding e-mails (paraphrasing): “It’s better to have too much information than not enough. Send me everything you’ve got; I’ll sort it out.”
Nonetheless, the Mayor asked me to (paraphrasing) “….quit sending him e-mails”; which I immediately did.
Mr. Gruenhagen, for whatever reason, also pretty much ceased sending me information about what was taking place in the city. (Particularly regarding the Jacob Street Grinder Station with which I was ‘heavily involved’.) As an elected city official, I believe that I have a ’right to know’ what’s taking place in the city in which I was elected, by its residents, to serve.
The result is that now I, as a City Council member, am not fully, and properly, informed about what’s taking place in the city. The city in which I am an elected City Council member.
What’s wrong with this ‘picture’?
So, you ask, “Where do we go from here?” A good question, indeed.
Based on the foregoing narrative and supporting documents attached herewith, I have a sound basis for bringing this entire matter, and all of the associated details, to the attention of the Personnel Committee. The City of Hamburg simply can not continue to flourish under this type of hostile environment that has existed much too long. In retrospect, yes; I can be faulted for not directly addressing these issues when I observed them developing over a year ago.
Do I seek to have Mr. Gruenhagen terminated? A RESOUNDING “NO” !!
Do I want Mr. Gruenhagen to quit? A RESOUNDING “NO” !!
Do I wish to see Mr. Gruenhagen ‘change his ways’ for the betterment of our city, our employees and our citizens? YES; I do, and I believe I share that sentiment with the other members of the Hamburg City Council.
From what I can gather, Jeremy has done a ‘wonderful job’ for the City of Hamburg as its City Clerk/Treasurer for the past eighteen years. On the occasions that I have observed his interacting with members of the public, he has represented the city well. And professionally.
However, I feel that it is in the best interest of the City of Hamburg, it’s employees and its residents, that he gain control of his tirades and seemingly uncontrollable ‘outbursts’.
Yes; his job can be admittedly stressful. But when a stressful situation arises, we need someone who can provide leadership and act authoritatively, not ’collapse’ under the pressure and begin swearing and screaming.
Mr. Gruenhagen also needs to be reminded, and understand, that he works at the pleasure and direction of the City Council; collectively and individually. He is not OUR ’boss’; we are HIS ’boss’. We ‘direct’ him; he doesn’t ‘direct’ us.
To get a better, more complete understanding of everything contained in this letter (and more), I strongly encourage you to carefully read ALL of the documents attached herewith. Please pay particular attention to the areas highlighted in the enclosed documents.
Should you, Councilmember Trebesch, other City Council members or anyone else wish further information or explanations, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Richard Odoms,
Hamburg City Council Member
150 Jacob Street
Hamburg, Minnesota 55339
(612) 460-8212
Enclosures: Various documents in chronological order
The remaining six pages of my November 5, 2014 letter to then HAMBURG PERSONNEL COMMITTEE MEMBER and HAMBURG CITY COUNCIL MEMBER CHRIS LUND appear above. CLEARLY, AS EVIDENCED ABOVE; the 'BEHAVIORIAL ISSUES' with Gruenhagen
began LONG BEFORE the City was served with a lawsuit on July 31, 2019.
Yet, while both the MAYOR at the time and HAMBURG PERSONNEL COMMITTEE MEMBER CHRIS LUND, were CLEARLY and UNQUESTIONABLY MADE AWARE OF GRUENENHAGEN"S INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR, NUMEROUS TIMES; NO ACTION WAS EVER TAKEN AGAINST GRUENHAGEN !! That's why the CITY OF HAMBURG is STILL being forced to deal with all of the issues that I've been reporting on my Websites (and now in my book; "PUBLIC OFFICIALS BEHAVING BADLY") about the CITY OF HAMBURG, for the past TEN YEARS !!
Speaking of my book, regarding the 'SABOTAGING' of HAMBURG'S FIRE TRUCKS, here's an excerpt from Page 63 Of My
Book "PUBLIC OFFICIALS BEHAVING BADLY":
"I was REALLY DISTRESSED to hear HAMBURG CITY CLERK/TREASURER JEREMY GRUENHAGEN EVEN IMPLY, yet ACTUALLY BRING UP, former HAMBURG FIRE CHIEF BRAD DROEGE's name as the possible 'culprit'."
"For Gruenhagen to RECKLESSLY BESMERCH the GOOD NAME, REPUTATION and 'TRACK RECORD' of BRAD DROEGE, an OUTSTANDING, DEDICATED RESIDENT that has DONE SO MUCH FOR THE CITY OF HAMBURG during his time as a Firefighter and NINETEEN YEARS as the CITY'S FIRE CHIEF, is TOTALLY LUDICROUS and ABSOULUTELY IRRESPONSIBLE !! I thought; 'What a malevolent manner in which to 'misdirect' attention' !!" (AWAY from THEMSELVES.)
"I was TOTALLY ANGERED BY GRUENHAGEN'S 'SUGGESTION'; BRAD WAS MY CLOSE FRIEND; a person who I DEEPLY ADMIRED and UNCONDITIONALLY RESPECTED !!" (Emphasis added.)
For the HAMBURG CITY COUNCIL to ROUTINELY APPROVE SALARY INCREASES EVERY YEAR FOR GRUENHAGEN, that is simply REWARDING BAD BEHAVIOR and is DOING NOTHING TO ADDRESS, and CORRECT; GRUENHAGEN'S BAD BEHAVIOR !! You'll also find Gruenhagen's comments, recorded at a recent City Council meeting (CHECK BACK to hear the ACTUAL CONVERSATION); about his 'DISSATISFACTION' about the amount of TAXPAYER DOLLARS he receives as 'ON CALL' (OVERTIME) PAY. This was an 'issue' that first came up many years ago when I was on the HAMBURG CITY COUNCIL; and the 'contract' HAMBURG CITY ATTORNEY KELLEY C. DOHM at that time and at an UNRECORDED 'CLOSED' (NOD, NOD; WINK, WINK) City Council Meeting, CLEARLY STATED that GRUENHAGEN WAS NOT ENTITLED TO 'ON CALL. (OVERTIME) PAY because he is considered an EXEMPT EMPLOYEE; paid a 'SALARY' in lieu of
an HOURLY WAGE, performs 'ADMINISTRATIVE WORK' and IS NOT ENTITLED TO 'OVERTIME PAY' !!
Having worked for City and County 'government', both in an 'exempt' status as well as in a 'non-exempt' status most of my 'adult life', what Dohm said, 'sounded right' to me. I also addressed that 'issue' in my book, "PUBLIC OFFICIALS BEHAVING BADLY"; as well. PLEASE CHECK BACK LATER for MORE INFORMATION about the 'suspicious and questionable circumstances' of how MORE HAMBURG TAXPAYER DOLLARS ARE BEING SPENT.
This particular 'discovery' that I'm exposing, has a lot of 'moving parts' and will be of GREAT INTEREST to HAMBURG
TAXPAYERS !!Because of the complexity, details, secracy and the HUGE AMOUNT of TAXPYER DOLLARS INVOLVED, I'm
in the process of putting ALL of the information on ITS OWN WEBPAGE; please check my MASTER WEBPAGE INDEX Webpage frequently.
I will continue to expose many of the little know other TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE ACTIONS & MISCONDUCT that have taken place in the CITY OF HAMBURG so please CHECK BACK FREQUENTLY !! Virtually ALL of those deleterious ACTIONS & MISCONDUCT that have taken place have a 'common denominator' that is easily traceable and responsible for COSTING HAMBURG TAXPAYERS TENS (if not HUNDREDS) of THOUSANDS of TAXPAYER DOLLARS !!
As another example, the ABRUPT DEPARTURE of the 'DEPUTY' CITY CLERK who faithfully served he City for EIGHT YEARS, as well as the SEVERAL MONTH VACANCY of the City being WITHOUT A PUBLIC WORKS EMPLOYEE, are ALL ATTRIBUTABLE to the ABUSIVE
MISCONDUCT, ACTIONS and UNACCEPTABLE BEHAVIORS of GRUENHAGEN !! (Please check back to HEAR THE ACTUAL AUDIO of the (former) 'DEPUTY' CITY CLERK TELLING THE CITY COUNCIL what was taking place 'inside the walls of City Hall'. While she REPORTED TO HAMBURG MAYOR CHRIS LUND NUMEROUS TIMES what was taking place with Gruenhagen's inappropriate conduct and behavior LUND, and the CITY COUNCIL; NEVER TOOK ANY ACTION AGAINST GRUENHAGEN !!)
EVERYTHING is DOCUMENTED by the AUDIO of the CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS !! Why do you think I was SO ADAMANT, for SO MANY
YEARS, for the City to OBTAIN THE NECESSARY EQUIPMENT to ACCURATELY RECORD what takes place at the HAMBURG CITY COUNCIL meetings ??
The only two OTHER City Officials that I quickly realized had ANY 'decency and common sense', were the then MAYOR DICK MALZ
(no Webpage) and then CITY COUNCILMEMBER STEVE TREBESCH (also no Webpage). As for the 'contract' City Attorney,
MAYOR CHRIS LUND who ALL DESERVE to have THEIR OWN, INDIVIDUAL WEBPAGES because of their
involvement in what's taken place that you been reading about taking place in the CITY OF HAMBURG,
on my Websites about the CITY OF HAMBURG; for the past 5 YEARS !!
You'll read more about the 'problematic' conduct and behaviors later on this Webpage, but you'll first be interested in the November 5, 2015
letter that I wrote to then CITY COUNCILMEMBER CHRIS LUND, a Member if the 'Infamous' HAMBURG PERSONNEL COMMITTEE,
(suddenly; HAMBURG is a 'Bloomington or an Eden Prairie') regarding HAMBURG CITY CLERK/RTREASURER JEREMY
GRUENHAGEN, the first four pages of which, are shown below; the remaining six pages, and other
similar documents and information, will be posted on his Webpage as time permits.
When I joined the Hamburg City Council On January 1, 2013, it sure didn't take me long to realize that HAMBURG'S CITY CLERK/TREASURER
JEREMY GRUENHAGEN had 'issues'. As the weeks and months passed, I realized that I was suddenly elected to a real 'deleterious quagmire'
that I would continuously learn about, experience and be wittness to. While I initially didn't give much thought to the 'root cause' of what I
was observing, when I started doing some 'serious thinking' about what was taking place that I was witnessing, it soon became
evident to me that the 'common denominator' seemed to always be HAMBURG'S CITY CLERK/TREASURER.
And THAT's what turned out to 'be the case' for the NEXT FOUR YEARS !!
(And CONTINUES To Be TO THIS DATE !!)
Here's ANOTHER EXAMPLE That Took Place At
The September 24, 2024 Hamburg City Council Meeting:
From My Facebook Pages .........
MORE ABUSE OF POWER & AUTHORITY By PUBLIC OFFICIALS !!
As I predicted last spring what was going to happen, now that the CITY OF HAMBURG, at GREAT EXPENSE; has successfully 'bilked' privately owned property
out of the Hamburg resident that previously owned it, the City has now 'fired the first salvo' in trying to FORCE THE RESIDENT OUT OF BUSINESS !!
(The CITY OF HAMBURG WASTED BETWEEN $80,000.00 - $100,000.00 HAMBURG TAXPAYER DOLLARS
in their disgusting and underhanded efforts, and REFUSES to provide the EXACT DOLLAR AMOUNT !!)
THE CITY'S VINDICTIVE ACTION AGAINST A TAXPAYING RESIDENT, also COST THAT HAMBURG RESIDENT (about) $40,000.00 !! As is
SO OFTEN THE CASE, the only 'winners' in this long, protracted abuse of authority by the CITY OF HAMBURG, were THE LAWYERS !!
Listening to the audio recording of the September 24th HAMBURG CITY COUNCIL MEETING, clearly reveals
the beginning of the City's DESPICABLE, 'thinly veiled' attempt to 'run the guy out of town' !!
The City seems to forget about the 'GRANDFATHER CLAUSE' of 'LAND OWNERSHIP' !! (A grandfather clause is a legal provision that allows some
existing situations to be governed by an old rule while a new rule applies to future cases. It's also known as a legacy clause.)
To no one's surprise, the two HAMBURG CITY OFFICIALS 'spearheading' this devious and sinister 'plot' and ABUSE OF AUTHORITY, are
Of course, the NAMES of these TWO HAMBURG CITY OFFICIALS are VERY FAMILIAR to visitors to my Websites and are
'referenced' frequently on those Websites exposing their CORRUPT and ILLEGAL ACTIONS !!
For those of you who may not know who these two 'schlocks' really are and their serous deficit of ANY MORAL CHARACTER WHATSOEVER and
as JUST ONE EXAMPLE, LUND'S SON committed vandalism against CITY PROPERTY, OWNED BY HAMBURG TAXPAYERS !!
HOWEVER; the ACTIONS of 'LUND'S KID' were 'COVERED-UP' by the CITY OF HAMBURG and 'LUNDS KID' WAS NEVER HELD
ACCOUNTABLE FOR HIS CRIMINAL ACTS AGAINST THE DIGNITY of ALL of the other HAMBURG RESIDENTS !!
HAMBURG CITY CLERK/TREASURER JEREMY GRUENHAGEN; was ALSO INVOLVED IN THE 'COVER-UP' of the CRIMINAL ACTIONS of 'LUND'S KID'
by telling AT LEAST TWO CITY RESIDENTS (paraphrasing) "THE CITY WANTS TO 'KEEP IT QUIET' BECAUSE LUND'S KID IS INVOLVED !!"
THESE ARE DISHONEST & CORRUPT PEOPLE !! WHY IS LUND STILL 'IN OFFICE' ??
WHY DOES GRUENHAGEN STILL EVEN HAVE A JOB ??
You can listen to the entire disgusting, demeaning discussion where the sanctimonious GRUENHAGEN and LUND continually 'badger' the City resident at
the September 24th HAMBURG CITY COUNCIL MEETING; HERE'S A LINK to that audio: http://www.cityofhamburgmn.com/Meetings/9_24_2024_RM.mp3
advance the audio player to the 12 minute mark where the discussion of this whole 'charade' begins.
Keep checking my Website and Facebook pages about the CITY OF HAMBURG, www.HAMBURGMINNESOTA.com and
www.PUBLICOFFICIALSBEHAVINGBADLY.com as this 'issue' continues to unfold. (And the LEGAL EXPENSES
and WASTE OF HAMBURG TAXPAYER DOLLARS, CONTINUE TO MOUNT ONCE AGAIN !!)
Also, pay particular attention to when HAMBURG CITY CLERK/TREASURER JEREMY GRUENHAGEN asks,
"ARE YOU CALLING ME A LIAR?" Now THERE'S a SUPERFLUOUS QUESTION !!
Based on my OWN, PERSONAL experience with GRUENHAGEN, I would ask, "IS HIS MOUTH MOVING ?"
Providing ANSWERS, EXAMPLES & INFORMATION To Hamburg City Councilmember & "Vice Mayor" Tim Tracy's Question,
"HOW CAN THIS TOWN HAVE SO MANY PROBLEMS ALWAYS ?"
(If The City's "VICE MAYOR" Is ASKING That Question, IMAGINE What The CITY'S RESIDENTS Are Thinking !!)
The ANSWER To Councilmember Tracy's 'Question', Is Very BASIC And SIMPLE:
WITH NO THREAT OF 'SANCTIONS', A CITY EMPLOYEE THAT LIES TO A SINGLE CITY COUNCIL MEMBER, WILL CERTAINLY LIE TO OTHER
COUNCIL MEMBERS & THE PUBLIC, THAT PAY HIS SALARY !!
"TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE"
HAMBURG CITY OFFICIALS,
Instead Of OBEYING THE LAW, They Are WILLFULLY VIOLATING THE LAW
BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT BEING PROSECUTED !!
MINNESOTA STATUTE 609.43 MANDATES The BEHAVIOR And CONDUCT
Of PUBLIC OFFICIALS And PUBLIC EMPLOYEES, Is VERY
SPECIFIC And CLEARLY DEFINES The PENALTIES For
PUBLIC OFFICIAL And EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT:
2023 MINNESOTA STATUTES
609.43 MISCONDUCT OF PUBLIC OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE
A public officer or employee who does any of the following, for which no other sentence is specifically provided by law, may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of not
more than $3,000, or both:
(1) intentionally fails or refuses to perform a known mandatory, non-discretionary, ministerial duty of the office
or employment within the time or in the manner required by law; or
(2) in the capacity of such officer or employee, does an act knowing it is in excess of lawful authority or
knowing it is forbidden by law to be done in that capacity; or
(3) under pretense or color of official authority intentionally and unlawfully injures another in the other's
person, property, or rights; or
(4) in the capacity of such officer or employee, makes a return, certificate, official report, or other like
document having knowledge it is false in any material respect.
Because HAMBURG PUBLIC OFFICIALS Have NO ACCOUNTABILITY, BREAKING THE LAW Is MORE 'CONVENIENT' (And BENEFICIAL
To Them) Than FOLLOWING THE LAW !! That Was One Of The FIRST THINGS I NOTICED TAKING PLACE When I Was Elected
To The HAMBURG CITY COUNCIL (2013-2017 ) And, Apparently; HAS BEEN TAKING PLACE For MANY, MANY YEARS !!
THAT MUST CHANGE; As It Is Now, ALL Of HAMBURG'S PUBLIC OFFICIALS ARE ROUTINELY,
And PURPOSELY; VIOLATING THE LAW; WITHOUT FEAR OF REPERCUSSION !!
Being A 'CITY OFFICIAL' Is A Position NOT TO BE TAKEN LIGHTLY As It Is In The CITY OF HAMBURG. Please Check Back Frequently As
I Provide MORE GRAPHIC EXAMPLES Of OBVIOUS PUBLIC OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT By HAMBURG CITY OFFICIALS That
Was Either IGNORED Or 'SWEPT UNDER THE RUG' By 'THE GOOD OLD BOYS (and GIRLS) CLUB'; HAMBURG CITY OFFICIALS !!
In Addition To Just Some Of The Examples Shown To The Right, HAMBURG MAYOR CHRIS LUND'S EMBARASSING &
INAPPROPRIATE 'CONTRIBUTION' Is Available At: www.THEDELTASHOW.com/HAMBURGMAYORCHRISLUND.html
COPYRIGHT 2024
RICHARD ODOMS
150 Jacob Street * Hamburg, Minnesota 55339 * (612) 460-8212
E-Mail Address: [email protected]
Website: www.PUBLICOFFICIALSBEHAVINGBADLY.com
POLICE OFFICER/DEPUTY SHERIFF - 1966 - 1997
HAMBURG CITY COUNCIL MEMBER - 2013 - 2017
Before anyone gets their underwear in a knot, be advised that This Website and/or any of its contents, may NOT
be printed, photographed, reproduced, copied, recorded, altered, modified or adapted, in any manner,
without the prior written consent of the Webmaster. The entire content of this Website remains
the exclusive and sole property of the Website owner and publisher and is protected
under the First Amendment Of The Constitution of the United States of America.
As
Revealed By
RETIRED
31 YEAR
CAREER POLICE OFFICER
&
DEPUTY SHERIFF
RICHARD ODOMS
INVESTIGATING
And
EXPOSING
The 'COVER-UP' Of
MISCONDUCT,
CORRUPTION,
MALFEASANCE,
MISFEASANCE
And
NON-FEASANCE
Of
PUBLIC OFFICIALS
In
FORMER CITY COUNCILMEMBER & RETIRED
POLICE OFFICER/DEPUTY SHERIFF
EXPOSES CORRUPTION, MISCONDUCT & 'COVER UP' IN CARVER COUNTY THAT LOCAL MEDIA REFUSES TO
REPORT BECAUSE OF WHO'S INVOLVED !!
ABOUT THE WEBMASTER
And Author Of The Book
Born In 1943, I Am Now A Retired Law Enforcement
Officer Whose Career Began in 1966.
In addition to attaining the rank of Sergeant with the MAPLE PLAIN (Minnesota) POLICE DEPARTMENT (now WEST HENNEPIN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY), I joined the HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE (Minnesota's Largest Sheriff's Office) in October 1969 as a Senior Deputy Sheriff and attained the rank of Sergeant in both the RADIO/COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION as well as in the WARRANT/FUGITIVE DIVISION.
While continuously maintaining a valid MINNESOTA POLICE OFFICER STANDARDS & TRAINING BOARD (P.O.S.T.) License until it's expiration in 1997, I retired from the Sheriff's Office in September 1984. I am also a former EMERGENCY MEDICAL TECHNICIAN (E.M.T.) and a UNITED STATES AIR FORCE FIRE PROTECTION SPECIALIST.
In 2012, I was elected to a four year term on the HAMBURG (Minnesota) CITY COUNCIL, I currently host THREE Websites as well as a regularly scheduled hour long, five times a week Internet Show and a series of Internet Programs that primarily feature current & retired Law Enforcement and other Public Safety Officials.To order a copy of my book,please CLICK HERE.
HAMBURG CITY OFFICIALS
Also Referred To As
"THE HAMBURG SEVEN"
(And They're ANYTHING But Magnificent !!)
Mayor:
CHRISTOPHER M. LUND
City Councilmembers
*TIM TRACY, *JESSICA WEBER, MITCH POLZIN, ERIC POPPLER
(*Terms Expire 12-31-24; BOTH Seeking Re-election UNOPPOSED !!)
City Clerk/Treasurer
JEREMY GRUENHAGEN
The PERSON RESPONSIBLE For Everything That You've
Been Reading About For OVER TEN YEARS !!
'Contract' City Attorney
KELLY C. DOHM
Representing The Waconia Based Law Firm Of
MELCHERT, HUBERT & SJODIN. (But NOT very well !!)
First, Get IMPORTANT BACKGROUND By Reviewing The HAMBURG SURVEY
That CLEARLY DESCRIBES 'How It All Began'.
A PUBLIC OFFICIAL CAN NOT LIE, COMPOSE, Or CONSPIRE TO CREATE ANY 'OFFICIAL CITY
DOCUMENT' That CONTAINS FALSE, UNTRUE Or FABRICATED INFORMATON, With The
INTENT To DECEIVE; Or ACTUALLY DECEIVING, ANYONE !!
Yet; The EVIDENCE CLEARLY PROVES That's EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED !!
To Do So, Is A VIOLATION Of MINNESOTA STATUTE 609.43* (Shown Below) And, Upon Conviction;
The DEDENDANT May Be SENTENCED TO IMPRISIONMENT FOR NOT MORE THAN ONE YEAR
Or To A PAYMENT OF A FINE OF NOT MORE THAN $3,000.00; or BOTH.
*ANY PUBLIC OFFICIAL Who Is AWARE Of VIOLATIONS Of MINNESOTA STATUTE 609.43 And FAILS TO TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION
Is ALSO GUILTY OF VIOLATING THE LAW And Are Also SUBJECT TO THE SAME PENALTIES As The
DEFENDANT Who Initially VIOLATED The QUOTED STATUTE !!
Although There Have Been
NUMEROUS VIOLATIONS OF MINNESOTA STATUTE 609.43,
MISCONDUCT OF PUBLIC OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE
MAYOR(S) AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS OF THE CITY OF HAMBURG,
to the best of my knowledge,
HAVE NEVER SANCTIONED HAMBURG CITY CLERK/TREASURER JEREMY GRUENHAGEN FOR ANY OF HIS ACTS OF DISHONESTY OR MISCONDCT !!
OTHER HAMBURG CITY OFFICIALS, CARVER COUNTY ATTORNEY;
FAILING TO TAKE ANY ACTION WHEN WARRANTED
also constitutes
MALFEASANCE, MISFEASANCE & NONFEASANCE
and is also a
VIOLATION OFMINNESOTA STATUTE 609.43,
MISCONDUCT OF PUBLIC OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE:
MINNESOTA STATUTE 609.43 MANDATES The BEHAVIOR And CONDUCT
Of PUBLIC OFFICIALS And PUBLIC EMPLOYEES, Is VERY
SPECIFIC And CLEARLY DEFINES The PENALTIES For
PUBLIC OFFICIAL And EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT:
2023 MINNESOTA STATUTES
609.43 MISCONDUCT OF PUBLIC OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE
A public officer or employee who does any of the following, for which no other sentence is specifically provided by law, may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment
of a fine of not more than $3,000, or both:
(1) intentionally fails or refuses to perform a known mandatory, nondiscretionary, ministerial duty of the
office or employment within the time or in the manner required by law; or
(2) in the capacity of such officer or employee, does an act knowing it is in excess of lawful authority or
knowing it is forbidden by law to be done in that capacity; or
(3) under pretense or color of official authority intentionally and unlawfully injures another in the other's
person, property, or rights; or
(4) in the capacity of such officer or employee, makes a return, certificate, official report, or other like
document having knowledge it is false in any material respect.
PLEASE CHECK BACK FREQUENTLY !!
Additionally, ALL HAMBURG CITY OFFICIALS,
CARVER COUNTY ATTORNEY; Also
GUILTY OF INTENTIONALLY VIOLATING MINNESOTA STATUTE 351.14:
2023 MINNESOTA STATUTES
351.14 DEFINITIONS.
Subdivision 1.Applicability. The definitions in this section apply to sections 351.14 to 351.23.
Subd. 2.Malfeasance. "Malfeasance" means the willful commission of an unlawful or wrongful act in the performance of a public official's duties which is outside the scope of the authority of the public official and which infringes on the rights of any person or entity.
Subd. 3.Nonfeasance. "Nonfeasance" means the willful failure to perform a specific act which is a required part of the duties of the public official.
Subd. 4.Misfeasance. "Misfeasance" means the negligent performance of the duties of a public official or the negligent failure to perform a specific act which is a required part of the duties of the public official.
Subd. 5.Elected county official. "Elected county official" means any public official who is elected to countywide office or appointed to an elective countywide office, including county attorney, (Plese visit www.THEDELTASHOW.com/COUNTYATTORNEYMARKMETZ.html), county sheriff, county auditor, county recorder, county treasurer, and soil and water conservation supervisor. "Elected county official" also means a county commissioner elected or appointed from a commissioner district or a soil and water conservation district supervisor elected or appointed from a supervisor district established under section 103C.311, subdivision 2.
PLEASE CHECK BACK FREQUENTLY !!
COPYRIGHT 2024
RICHARD ODOMS
150 Jacob Street * Hamburg, Minnesota 55339 * (612) 460-8212
E-Mail Address: [email protected]
Website: www.PUBLICOFFICIALSBEHAVINGBADLY.com
POLICE OFFICER/DEPUTY SHERIFF - 1966 - 1997
HAMBURG CITY COUNCIL MEMBER - 2013 - 2017
Before anyone gets their underwear in a knot, be advised that This Website and/or any of its contents, may NOT
be printed, photographed, reproduced, copied, recorded, altered, modified or adapted, in any manner,
without the prior written consent of the Webmaster. The entire content of this Website remains
the exclusive and sole property of the Website owner and publisher and is protected
under the First Amendment Of The Constitution of the United States of America.
C
O
P
Y
C
O
P
Y
C
O
P
Y
C
O
P
Y
C
O
P
Y
C
O
P
Y
C
O
P
Y
C
O
P
Y
C
O
P
Y
C
O
P
Y
C
O
P
Y
C
O
P
Y
C
O
P
Y
C
O
P
Y
C
O
P
Y
C
O
P
Y
C
O
P
Y
